Technology start-ups, especially those operating in the web and mobile sectors, are thriving in the 21st century. Digital Apps in particular continue to significantly shape the meaning and practice of modern-day entrepreneurship. Untold numbers of start-ups are created every year, with ambitious founders hoping to create the next Instagram, Uber, or Facebook.

And although the overall trajectory seems to be one of ever-increasing numbers of new companies, the fact remains that only a very small percentage of start-ups ever achieve the growth needed to become billion-dollar companies. So how do they do it? In this article I’ll discuss 3 crucial features that virtually all high growth start-ups share in common.

Many hugely successful start-ups created over the past two decades are neither founded upon truly revolutionary ideas nor the results of getting into the market before anybody else.

As I recently noted:

“Myspace and Friendster were established, and had many active users, before Facebook [was ever created]; there were a variety of group buying websites operating a decade before Groupon emerged; and electric cars were available on American roads before Tesla rose to dominance”. 

Likewise, Google emerged after Altavista and Yahoo were already online and operational, and Dropbox was founded at a time when cloud storage start-ups were arguably becoming cliché.

Rather than coming up with utterly groundbreaking ideas or launching far before existing markets had reached “saturation”, the Dropboxes, Facebooks, Googles, Groupons, and Teslas of the start-up world are distinguished from the other 90% of all new companies that ultimately fail by their commitment to execution.

Angel investor, Martin Zwilling, describes the meaning and significance of execution in the following way:

“Every startup begins with an idea, but from that point forward, it’s all about execution. Founders soon learn that customers only spend real money for solutions rather than ideas. Investors have also learned not to invest in ideas but only in entrepreneurs and teams who can deliver solutions. Success requires moving your passion quickly from the idea to the business implementation. A good execution requires a plan and the right people, combined to create operational excellence and exceptional customer value. Companies that do this best become market leaders”.

High growth start-ups are new companies that quickly and effectively scale and expand their operations.

The “classic” examples are ventures like Facebook, Google, Twitter, and Uber.

More recent cases include companies like Slack and CloudFlare.

Crucially, high growth start-ups know how to execute in 3 ultra important ways:

  1. They master the art of viral marketing;
  2. They have excellent customer retention capabilities; and
  3. They understand exactly to whom they should market the first iterations of their products (i.e., they know when to “cross the chasm”).

Let’s consider each of these 3 elements in greater detail.

1. High Growth Start-Ups Use Viral Marketing to Grow Their Customers

(image source)

A concept crucial to understanding how businesses strategize their efforts to recruit customers is the customer acquisition cost (CAC).

Chase Hughes, over at the Kissmetrics Blog, provides a straightforward explanation of this concept:

“CAC…is the cost of convincing a potential customer to buy a product or service. … [Your] CAC can be calculated by simply dividing all the costs spent on acquiring more customers (marketing expenses) by the number of customers acquired in the period the money was spent. For example, if [your] company spent $100 on marketing in a year and acquired 100 customers in the same year, [your] CAC is $1.00”.

When it comes to start-ups, a high CAC is often deadly.

The average online company, such as an e-commerce store, might have to pay upwards of $200 or even $300 in order to acquire one new customer via traditional marketing and advertising.

To put that into perspective, try and imagine Dropbox and Instagram each paying anywhere from $40 billion to $60 billion in order to accumulate their user bases of 200 million people!

Here’s something that sounds shocking but is true: some of the fastest growing technology, web, and mobile startups spend very little money on direct marketing and advertising efforts aimed at acquiring new customers.

How can this be so? How can companies with tens, if not hundreds, of millions of users acquire such a massive customer base without having to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to recruit them?

It all comes down to the fact that high growth startups use viral marketing strategies to expand their user bases.

One way to think about viral growth is to contrast it against the traditional “marketing funnel”.

The conventional marketing funnel portrays companies as paying lots of money in order to drive traffic toward their products (websites, apps, etc.) in an effort to convert a small fraction of that traffic to active, paying customers. 

A viral funnel is the inverse of the traditional funnel: rather than a huge number of potential customers producing a small number of actual customers, a small number of actual customers help bring in exponentially more customers.

In other words, each new user brings in one or more new users, who then bring in one or more new users themselves, and so on: 


Viral marketing is based on the use of a product (e.g., a new Instagram user naturally recommending that his friends give the app a try) and sometimes also on the implementation of a referral system (e.g., a Lyft user circulating a referral code that allows her and the person who applies the code to each cash-in a free ride).

Here are some famous examples:

The key metric to follow here is the viral coefficient.

The viral coefficient represents the number of new users that each existing user brings over to the company.

For example, a viral coefficient of 1.5 means that, on average:

Importantly, if your start-up can maintain a viral coefficient above 1.0 then you don’t need any sort of substantial marketing budget to keep growing.

2. High Growth Start-Ups Have Excellent Customer Retention Capabilities

(image source)

Technology start-ups operate in highly competitive environments.

As an example, consider mobile apps.

Research on smartphone use suggests that:

These basic figures persist despite the fact that there are currently 2.8 million and 2.2 million apps available for download on Google’s Play Store and Apple’s App Store, respectively.

What separates the relatively small number of “go-to” apps (such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram) from the huge number of “download à install à delete à forget” apps?

It’s this:

Ultra successful start-ups create products that eventually become the focus of new habits.

If you think about all the various products that have been adopted en masse in modern society—from credit cards, toothbrushes, and televisions to automobiles, computers, and MP3 players—then you’ll realize that they actually aren’t commonly perceived as products (or at least not primarily).

Instead, they’re simply part of our everyday routines and regular behaviours.

Taking our smartphones with us whenever we leave our houses for extended periods of time is just something that most of us always do.

We do, of course, recognize toothbrushes and the like as things that are manufactured, bought, and sold for money but because they’re so thoroughly ingrained into our habitual ways of acting we typically see these items as things we simply “can’t live without”.

And creating products that customers can’t stand to be without is one of the fundamental components of high growth start-ups’ abilities to retain their customers over long periods of time.

Let’s briefly discuss the essentials of how habits work before then looking at some key examples of hugely successful companies whose growth can be attributed to their habit-forming products. 

Author of The Power of Habit, Charles Duhigg, argues that “a simple neurological loop [resides] at the core of every habit, a loop that consists of three parts: [a] cue, a routine and a reward”.


(image source)

Here’s how Duhigg describes these 3 key aspects:

“There’s a cue, which is like a trigger for the behavior to start unfolding. A routine, which is the habit itself, [i.e.,] the behavior, the automatic…doing [of] what you do when you do a habit. And then at the end, there’s a reward. And the reward is how our neurology learns to encode this pattern for the future”.

In order for a habit to take hold, all 3 elements must be present.

Hazel Gale expands on Duhigg’s description, noting the following:

“The cue is the thing that triggers the habitual behaviour. It could be a negative emotion like loneliness, boredom or stress. Or, it could be a certain situation, a group of friends, the time of the day[,] etc. 

The routine is the habit itself: the biting of nails, smoking of cigarettes, or walking over to the fridge and eating a massive lump of cheese[.] …

The reward could be anything pleasurable. It might be as obvious as the physical stimulation of nicotine or sugar[.] … It could be connected to a feeling of acceptance, belonging or achievement; or it could simply be an excuse to get away from your desk”.

Thinking about these dynamics from the standpoint of mobile apps, we can see that: 

The following chart highlights several of today’s most successful high growth start-ups in order to show that they do indeed rely on creating habit-forming products in order to retain their customers: 


One of the advantages that start-ups with habit-forming products enjoy is a sort of self-generating growth loop in which the more their customers use their products, the less likely such customers are to permanently abandon their products.

This phenomenon is known as the “sunk costs trap”, whereby we become more liable to stick with (or finish) some system, task, or behaviour the more resources we sink into it.

The sunk costs trap usually has a negative connotation associated with it.

For instance, it explains why a company might continue pouring money into what are clearly poorly performing investments: “We’ve already invested $3.5 million at this point! It wouldn’t make any sense to abandon the project! We can fix it!”.

When it comes to high growth start-ups and successful customer retention, it’s typically more about the time and other resources that users invest into using specific products than it is about feeling “forced” to keep doing something even though it’s deeply unsatisfying:

The following graph, which compares 90-day retention rates with frequency of use per week for a variety of app categories, gives some insight into how it’s possible for massive high growth start-ups like Facebook to receive a $200 billion valuation.


3. High Growth Start-Ups Know Exactly Who Their Early Adopters Are


Airbnb co-founder, Brian Chesky, once told an audience at Y Combinator: 

“It’s better to have 100 people [who] love you than [to] find[] a million who just sort of like you. Build your business one person at a time. Just focus on 100 people. If they love you, they will market the product for you and tell everyone else. Go to your users. Do one scalable thing, one person at a time. It’s actually [that] simple”.

Chesky’s remarks point toward a crucial fact:

All successful start-ups share the demonstrated ability to determine the exact kinds of people to whom they should market the early iterations of their products.

As we’ve discussed over at Appster in the past, one of the essential stages involved in building a successful product that achieves a solid product-market fit is the creation of a minimum viable product (MVP).

Part of effectively developing, testing, and refining your MVP involves understanding two crucial things about how people embrace new technologies:

  1. Everett Rogers’ theory of disruptive technologies, which states that different types of people adopt revolutionary technologies to different degrees and at different speeds; and
  2. Geoffrey Moore’s theory, outlined in Crossing the Chasm, that contemporary start-ups must concentrate on effectively dominating the early adopter market—repairing bugs, responding to customer issues, winning the hearts of users, and gradually building a brand reputation—before trying to “cross the chasm” by seeking out success in mainstream markets. 

The chasm is the key space splitting the innovator and early adopter sectors from the mainstream customers: 


In a recent article, I spoke rather extensively about the need for start-ups to take into consideration the key differences between different sectors of the market when launching their products:

“[S]uccessful start-ups tend not to market to mainstream consumers because these consumers typically don’t trust new technologies: they’re looking for safety, security, and brand reputation whereas most start-ups are buggy, unknown, and relatively unproven at least during their earliest days.

Customers in the mainstream care about two things, i.e., established brands and security.

They generally don’t buy new things unless other people are clearly already using (and recommending) them.

Early adopters, on the other hand, don’t care if your company/brand is unheard of, yet-to-be-proven, or straddled with the risks associated with pushing a new product. 

They’re actually drawn to your venture by these very kinds of novel and radical qualities that characterize it”.

If you look at the top start-ups from the past two decades then you’ll notice that all of them began by first dominating small segments of their markets before then trying to takeover the mainstream:

What these companies (and many other high growth start-ups like them) did is successfully execute on when to cross the chasm from the early adopter segment to the mainstream population.

To become truly disruptive, new products must dominate early adopter markets first. Early adopters are both open to novelty and relatively forgiving if product bugs arise. 

Once a product succeeds amongst early adopters, the company behind it can leverage this much-needed validation by successfully targeting mainstream users.

Mainstream customers are likely to be much more receptive of a product when they know that they aren’t the “guinea pigs” on whom some potentially unreliable gadget is being thrust.

Dominate the early adopter market first, fix your bugs without fatally damaging your reputation, and establish your brand name—these are the key steps to convincing mainstream customers to give your product a try.


If You like This Article Then Be Sure to Download Our Free Whitepaper!


And learn more about the true cost of developing an app.  

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join over 61,449 subscribers to recieve our weekly newsletter packed with actionable device on how to start and grow a startup.

A 7-Min Guide to Cross Platform App Development
Nobody’s buying anything in your app?
Seven ways to improve your marketing and sales process.
Android App Ideas: How to Dominate Google Play
Simple App Ideas: How to Find the Next Big Thing
And how some of the best app ideas are the simple ones
How to Build a Social Media App (that catches fire)
A 7-Min Guide to Cross Platform App Development
Nobody’s buying anything in your app?
Seven ways to improve your marketing and sales process.
Android App Ideas: How to Dominate Google Play
Simple App Ideas: How to Find the Next Big Thing
And how some of the best app ideas are the simple ones
How to Build a Social Media App (that catches fire)
App Analytics – The Best Mobile App Analytic Tools for 2019
11 Powerful Mobile App Marketing Strategies For 2019
How To Get Users For Your App
The Ultimate Mobile App Marketing Guide [2019]
How to Make an App and Start an App Business – A Beginner’s Guide.
Should Your Business Invest in a Mobile App?
Mobile applications for Businesses
Protect Your App Idea with an NDA [Free Template]
A Beginner’s Guide to App Development
A Comprehensive Guide to Cross-Platform App Development
Hiring App Developers: Are You Making the Right Choice?
The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Blockchain Apps
How to Secure Funding for Your Mobile App Startup in 2018